The more people think about the environment, the more complexities will come to the surface. There is an ongoing debate in the Canadian Green movement, one that illustrates an important distinction, namely that between hard choices and moral dilemmas. We will have to face moral dilemmas when dealing with the difficulties of issues like global warming.

The women run on logic and the men on emotions. This seems to be the case for three major contests in American politics.

We got a good look at politics in action via Wilson-Raybould's testimony recently. Is this the way that we want our politics to be done?

Is it okay to distort the truth to support a moral/political position?